Abstract

Michael Moon's refreshing and original attempt to situate Henry James as "one queer culture-maker among others" (3) is, in several important ways, a corrective departure from the imperatives that have turned current gay literary studies into a period of consolidation rather than a phase of innovation of the sort we saw around 1990. Moon understands the critical limitations of what Ross Posnock has called "the cramped aura of sanctity [that] has grown up around . . . James's cultural presence," the fetishized icon that has "repress[ed] some of the deepest impulses of his art and life" (81). In articulating these impulses, Moon offers the most intelligent definition of Jamesian "queerness" that I have yet encountered--a term, like "performativity," that has been so evacuated of specificity in its academic circulation and that is so frequently and narrowly assumed to be self-evident that many writers have abandoned it. The "force and range" of queer James, he insists, are functions of "the daring and risky weirdness, dramatic uncanniness, erotic offcenteredness, and unapologetic perversity" (4) of his best writing. And it is this power to startle, to scandalize, to disorient identity and desire that Moon traces so assiduously.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.