Abstract

BackgroundGenus Citrus (Rutaceae) comprises many important cultivated species that generally hybridize easily. Phylogenetic study of a group showing extensive hybridization is challenging. Since the genus Citrus has diverged recently (4–12 Ma), incomplete lineage sorting of ancestral polymorphisms is also likely to cause discrepancies among genes in phylogenetic inferences. Incongruence of gene trees is observed and it is essential to unravel the processes that cause inconsistencies in order to understand the phylogenetic relationships among the species.Methodology and Principal Findings(1) We generated phylogenetic trees using haplotype sequences of six low copy nuclear genes. (2) Published simple sequence repeat data were re-analyzed to study population structure and the results were compared with the phylogenetic trees constructed using sequence data and coalescence simulations. (3) To distinguish between hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting, we developed and utilized a coalescence simulation approach. In other studies, species trees have been inferred despite the possibility of hybridization having occurred and used to generate null distributions of the effect of lineage sorting alone (by coalescent simulation). Since this is problematic, we instead generate these distributions directly from observed gene trees. Of the six trees generated, we used the most resolved three to detect hybrids. We found that 11 of 33 samples appear to be affected by historical hybridization. Analysis of the remaining three genes supported the conclusions from the hybrid detection test.ConclusionsWe have identified or confirmed probable hybrid origins for several Citrus cultivars using three different approaches–gene phylogenies, population structure analysis and coalescence simulation. Hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting were identified primarily based on differences among gene phylogenies with reference to null expectations via coalescence simulations. We conclude that identifying hybridization as a frequent cause of incongruence among gene trees is critical to correctly infer the phylogeny among species of Citrus.

Highlights

  • The genus Citrus L. includes commercially important cultivars grown in tropical to temperate parts of the world over several thousands of years [1]

  • Hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting were identified primarily based on differences among gene phylogenies with reference to null expectations via coalescence simulations

  • Phylogenetic trees constructed based on the best-fitting models for each gene using Bayesian analysis (BA) show these general patterns: i) citrons form a well supported clade in 5 gene trees; ii) mandarin are in a clade with strong support in 4 gene trees; iii) most pummelos cluster together in 5 gene trees and iv) the trifoliates clustered well in all 6 gene trees (Figures 1, 2, and 3, Figures S2, S4 and S5)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The genus Citrus L. includes commercially important cultivars grown in tropical to temperate parts of the world over several thousands of years [1]. The most widely accepted classification of Citrus and closely related genera was proposed by Swingle and Reece [1] who recognized 16 species in the genus Citrus, or, 29 species when other taxa of Group C are included in the genus (see below). Another Citrus taxonomist, Tanaka, has identified as many as 162 species in the genus [5]. Genus Citrus (Rutaceae) comprises many important cultivated species that generally hybridize . Incongruence of gene trees is observed and it is essential to unravel the processes that cause inconsistencies in order to understand the phylogenetic relationships among the species

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call