Abstract

ABSTRACTIntroduction: The most prescribed treatment option for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is CPAP; however, its adherence is limited. Oral Appliance therapy (OAT) is frequently an option or even an adjuvant, being the mandibular advancement Oral Appliance (OAm) the most used prescription. It modifies the upper airway, improving the airway patency. OAm construction is based on the occlusal plane to disocclusion. In this study, the DIORS® appliance was used, a singular OAm, based on Neuro-Occlusal Rehabilitation concepts, that uses Camper’s plane as a disocclusion reference, in order to achieve neuromuscular balance and functional stability. Objective: This study primarily aimed to assess the DIORS® effectiveness in relation to clinical and polysomnographic outcomes. It was also evaluated if the use of DIORS® is as effective as titrated CPAP to treat CPAP non-adherent patients.Methods: Twenty patients were included in this study. Objective and subjective clinical data were assessed at a sleep laboratory using all-night polysomnography, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), taken at three moments: Baseline, CPAP titration, and using DIORS®. Analysis of respiratory parameters as apnea/hypopnea index (AHI), oxyhemoglobin saturation levels, the arousal index and daytime sleepiness were taken as criteria for a successful OAT. Results: Respiratory and arousal parameters improved in both therapies, while DIORS® promoted a better ESS. Conclusion: Results from the present work support that DIORS® is a viable and effective adjuvant therapy for patients with moderate to severe OSA non-adherent to CPAP.

Highlights

  • The most prescribed treatment option for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP); its adherence is limited

  • Several studies compare CPAP to OAm, and show that CPAP is more effective in reducing Apnea/Hypopnea Index (AHI).[3,5]

  • The criteria for success in therapies were assessed with Arousal Index and respiratory parameters (Apnea/Hypopnea Index [apnea/hypopnea index (AHI)], Oxyhemoglobin Saturation [O2Sa], and daytime sleepiness)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The most prescribed treatment option for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is CPAP; its adherence is limited. Adherence to CPAP is limited[2,3] and for non-adherent patients, Oral Appliance Therapy (OAT) is often an option or even an adjuvant treatment.[1,4,5,6,7,8,9] The most common type of oral appliance is the mandibular advancement Oral Appliance (OAm). Excessive sleepiness levels give rise to a primary and clinically important outcome in a sleep apnea patient’s follow-up, apparently showing no difference between OAm and CPAP treatments.[10,11] Recent studies have indicated that, despite the advantage of CPAP on AHI reduction, a high compliance to OAm, compared to CPAP11, leads to similar therapeutic effectiveness

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call