Abstract

A single dose, single point method of predicting patients' oral maintenance theophylline dosage has been compared with a noninvasive method. Twenty patients with obstructive lung disease received an oral dose (6 mg kg-1) of micro-crystalline theophylline. The plasma theophylline concentration after 8-10 h was then used to calculate the optimum maintenance dose of sustained release aminophylline required to achieve steady state concentrations between 55 and 110 mumols l-1. The mean steady state plasma theophylline concentration for this dosage schedule was also predicted by a method using population average pharmacokinetic parameters (assumed clearance method). These predictions were then compared with observed concentration-time profiles at steady state. The mean difference between the observed values and those predicted from a morning test dose was -0.11 mumol l-1 (95% CI -7.0 to +7.2). A larger difference (-7.4 mumol l-1 95% CI -18.2 to +3.4) was found for the assumed clearance method. Since the confidence intervals contain zero, these differences are not significantly different from zero at the 5% level, although the morning test dose method allowed prediction of the whole concentration-time profile and was more precise. An evening test dose was also used in the study, but the mean difference between the observed values and those predicted from this method was larger at -24.8 mumol l-1 (95% CI -32.89 to -17.21) and was significantly different from zero. This study indicates that a morning test dose followed by a single blood sample can be used to establish maintenance theophylline therapy quickly and safely in selected patients.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.