Abstract

Intersections, especially those without traffic signals, are prone to frequent traffic accidents and disorder. The regulation of vehicle speed is an effective measure that can be taken in order to mitigate accidents and alleviate disorder at unsignalized intersections. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of four different temporary low-cost speed-calming measures: traffic crash barrels, lane markings, intersection markings, and a combination of the three. In this study, we used a driving simulator to design four speed-calming static measures that are typical of intersections; we then statistically analyzed the speed and acceleration data (recorded by the driving simulator) and the driver’s visual data (recorded by an eye tracker). The simulation results demonstrated that different speed-calming measures have varied effects on the attention and visual fixations of drivers; however, they are all effective in reducing the average driving speed at the intersection. The traffic-channelizing lane demonstrated superior performance compared to the other three measures in terms of its cumulative impact on deceleration, driving comfort, and safety. The experimental findings presented herein broaden the range of currently accessible temporary speed-limiting strategies and provide valuable insight into intersections that require low-cost speed management solutions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call