Abstract
This study examines the impact of missing rates and data imputation methods on test dimensionality. We consider how missing rate levels (10%, 20%, 30%, and 50%) and the six missed data imputation methods (Listwise, Serial Mean, Linear Interpolation, Linear Trend, EM, and Regression) affect the structure of a test. A simulation study is conducted using the SPSS 15.0 EFA and CFA programs. The EFA results for the six methods are similar, and all results obtained two factors. The CFA results also fit the hypothesized two factor structure model for all six methods. However, we observed that the EM method fits the EFA results relatively well. When the percentage of missing data is less than 20%, the impact of the imputation methods on test dimensionality is not statistically significant. The Serial Mean and Linear Trend methods are suggested for use when the percentage of missing data is greater than 30%.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
