Abstract

Air leakage through the envelope of commercial buildings in the United States accounts for approximately 6% of their energy use. Various simulation approaches have been proposed to estimate the impact of air leakage on building energy use. Although approaches that are based on detailed airflow modeling appear to be the most accurate to calculate infiltration heat transfer in simulation models, these approaches tend to require significant modeling expertise and effort. To make these energy savings estimates more readily available to building owners and designers, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Air Barrier Association of America, and the US Department of Energy (DOE) are developing a user-friendly online calculator that applies a detailed airflow modeling approach to examine energy savings due to airtightness in commercial buildings. The calculator, however, is limited to 52 US cities and a few cities in Canada and China. This paper describes the development of an alternative, simplified method to estimate energy savings from improved airtightness. The proposed method uses the same detailed approach for hourly infiltration calculations as the online calculator but it expands the ability to estimate energy savings to all US cities using hourly outdoor air temperature as the only input. The new simple regression model-based approach was developed and tested with DOE’s standalone retail prototype building model. Results from the new approach and the calculator show good agreement. Additionally, a simple approach to estimate percent energy savings for retrofitted buildings was also developed; results were within 5% of the energy saving estimates from the online calculator.

Highlights

  • Commercial buildings in the United States consume about 19.7 petajoules (18.6 trillion BTU)of energy per year [1]

  • Simulations focused on four airtightness levels for six-sided envelopes; that is, the the below-grade envelope area are included in the normalization of the air leakage rate

  • In cities with relatively mild summers, cooling energy use increased with lower air leakage rates because in leaky buildings infiltration of outdoor air that was at a lower temperature than the indoor air lessened heat gains from internal loads

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Commercial buildings in the United States consume about 19.7 petajoules (18.6 trillion BTU)of energy per year [1]. Among the envelope-related heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) loads, air leakage is the third most influential component in commercial buildings behind conduction through walls and windows [1]. Due to this large energy penalty, extensive research has been performed to develop methods for determining the air leakage rate of building envelopes [1,2,3,4,5]. Various methods have been proposed to simulate air leakage in buildings [11,12,13,14,15]. Major differences exist among these simulation methods with regard to what

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call