Abstract

Finding standard cost-effective methods for monitoring biodiversity is challenging due to trade-offs between survey costs (including expertise), specificity, and range of applicability. These trade-offs cause a lack of comparability among datasets collected by ecologists and conservationists, which is most regrettable in taxonomically demanding work on megadiverse inconspicuous taxon groups. We have developed a site-scale survey method for diverse sessile land organisms, which can be analyzed over multiple scales and linked with ecological insights and management. The core idea is that field experts can effectively allocate observation effort when the time, area, and priority sequence of tasks are fixed. We present the protocol, explain its specifications (taxon group; expert qualification; plot size; effort) and applications based on >800 original surveys of four taxon groups; and we analyze its effectiveness using data on polypores in hemiboreal and tropical forests. We demonstrate consistent effort-species richness curves and among-survey variation in contrasting ecosystems, and high effectiveness compared with casual observations both at local and regional scales. Bias related to observer experience appeared negligible compared with typical assemblage variation. Being flexible in terms of sampling design, the method has enabled us to compile data from various projects to assess conservation status and habitat requirements of most species (specifically rarities and including discovery of new species); also, when linked with site descriptions, to complete environmental assessments and select indicator species for management. We conclude that simple rules can significantly improve expert-based biodiversity surveys. Ideally, define (i) a common plot size that addresses multiple taxon groups and management goals; (ii) taxon groups based on field expertise and feasible number of species; (iii) sufficient and practical search time; (iv) a procedure for recording within-plot heterogeneity. Such a framework, combined with freedom to allocate effort on-site, helps utilizing full expertise of observers without losing technical rigor.

Highlights

  • Lack of data on species-rich inconspicuous land organisms remains a major knowledge problem in addressing the challenge of global biodiversity loss

  • We present and analyze a simple field protocol for standard surveys of a broad range of macroscopic sessile land organisms, which can produce data for diverse questions in conservation, ecology, and taxonomy

  • We have extensively documented the performance of a simple survey protocol for full assemblages of species-rich inconspicuous land organisms to address taxonomic, ecological and conservation topics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lack of data on species-rich inconspicuous land organisms remains a major knowledge problem in addressing the challenge of global biodiversity loss. Hunter and Webb [9] pioneered in outlining a recommendation to field lichenologists – assemblage-level surveys that follow ecological designs of conservation relevance (plots >2 ha in size; standard efforts; basic environmental descriptions of the plots) Their flexible approach did not, yet, scrutinize a field protocol, address survey repeatability or demonstrate its advantages based on a realized scheme. We use our original datasets on polypore fungi to analyze the effectiveness of the survey method for describing local species pools These mostly wood-inhabiting fungi form an ecological group with typically a few hundred species present in regional species pools; they have been popular targets in assessments of forest biodiversity and management impacts [31,32]. We provide an overview of the data analysis opportunities and the potential for management insights

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call