Abstract

Humans can rapidly categorise visual objects when presented in isolation. However, in everyday life we encounter multiple objects at the same time. Far less is known about how simultaneously active object representations interact. We examined such interactions by asking participants to categorise a target object at the basic (Experiment 1) or the superordinate (Experiment 2) level while the representation of another object was still active. We found that the "prime" object strongly modulated the response to the target implying that the prime's category was rapidly and automatically accessed, influencing subsequent categorical processing. Using drift diffusion modelling, we show that a prime, whose category is different from that of the target, interferes with target processing primarily during the evidence accumulation stage. This suggests that the state of category-processing neurons is altered by an active representation and this modifies the processing of other categories. Interestingly, the strength of interference increases with the similarity between the distractor and the target category. Considering these results and previous studies, we propose a general principle that category interactions are determined by the distance from a distractor's representation to the target's task-relevant categorical boundary. We argue that this principle arises from the specific architectural organisation of categories in the brain.

Highlights

  • Visual categorisation of natural stimuli can be performed extremely rapidly and efficiently

  • The number of participants in both experiments might seem limited at first glance, we believe that the data analysis that we performed is robust for several reasons

  • The specific implementation we utilised was based on hierarchical Bayesian analysis, which parcels out variance at the individual level (Wiecki, Sofer, & Frank, 2013) to determine the drift diffusion parameters

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Visual categorisation of natural stimuli can be performed extremely rapidly and efficiently (see Fabre-Thorpe, 2011 for a review). This ultra-rapid object categorisation is probably supported by feed-forward activity in the ventral stream, in the infero-temporal cortex (ITC; see DiCarlo, Zoccolan, & Rust, 2012 for an analysis). Most studies on object recognition and categorisation have examined objects belonging to a single category. In the real world, we routinely encounter multiple objects belonging to different categories.

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.