Abstract

Dr. Karl Schmetzer recently showed h o w near-flawless to flawless natural amethyst could be separated from synthetic amethyst on the basis of the presence of Brazil twinning i n the natural stones. Whereas Dr. Schmetzer's procedure required a special apparatus, the authors have determined that a standard gemological polariscopeis more than adequate to make the separation i n most cases. Although some synthetic amethyst does show evidence of twinning, in the synthetic stones examined thus far i t has taken a form that i s distinctly different from the Brazil twinning seen i n most natural amethysts. The presence of certain inclusions as well as the nature of the color zoning seen in natural versus synthetic amethysts is of primary use in making a separation. However, where there are no inclusions or color zoning, the presence of Brazil twinning in the natural amethyst will usually make the distinction.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.