Abstract

The most popular option contracts at the Chicago Board of Trade are options on Treasury note and bond futures contracts. An extensive empirical study of their valuation found that the Black model underprices in-the-money compared to out-of-the-money calls; that is, implied volatilites of the former calls exceeded those of the latter, especially for shorter term options. To investigate the cause of the misvaluation, the authors apply an option pricing model called canonical valuation, which uses the historical time series of the underlying futures price to estimate non-parametrically the probability distribution of the futures price on the expiration date. The canonical model does not underprice in-the-money calls relative to others and also has a lower mean absolute pricing error. It predicts that implied volatilities should be higher for shorter-term in-the-money calls than for other calls and should be higher in regimes of low-bond prices (i.e., high long-term interest rates), which is consistent with empirical evidence.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.