Abstract
If cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses are to produce identical rankings of programs, there is a simple equivalence between the criteria that enables one to derive a value for the effect that is being maximized. The value depends on knowing two magnitudes: (1) the cutoff cost-effectiveness ratio and (2) the marginal cost of public funds. The method is illustrated by trying to value state psychiatric hospital episodes using the revealed preference approach. Values varied by the state undertaking the expenditure (from a high of $52,526 in Pennsylvania to a low of $2,177 in Wisconsin) and the size of the predetermined federal budget assumed (a $1 billion budget produces a $10,418 value, and the actual budget of $7 billion produces a $54,540 value).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
