Abstract
ABSTRACTBacterial communities in water, soil, and humans play an essential role in environmental ecology and human health. PCR-based amplicon analysis, such as 16S rRNA sequencing, is a fundamental tool for quantifying and studying microbial composition, dynamics, and interactions. However, given the complexity of microbial communities, a substantial number of samples becomes necessary for analyses that parse the factors that determine microbial composition. A common bottleneck in performing these kinds of experiments is genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction, which is time-consuming, expensive, and often biased based on the types of species present. Direct PCR method is a potentially simpler and more accurate alternative to gDNA extraction methods that do not require the intervening purification step. In this study, we evaluated three variations of direct PCR methods using diverse heterogeneous bacterial cultures, including both Gram-positive and Gram-negative species, ZymoBIOMICS microbial community standards, and groundwater. By comparing direct PCR methods with DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kits for microbial isolates and DNeasy PowerSoil Kits for microbial communities, we found that a specific variant of the direct PCR method exhibits an overall efficiency comparable to that of the conventional DNeasy PowerSoil protocol in the circumstances we tested. We also found that the method showed higher efficiency for extracting gDNA from the Gram-negative strains compared to DNeasy Blood and Tissue protocol. This direct PCR method is 1,600 times less expensive ($0.34 for 96 samples) and 10 times simpler (15 min hands-on time for 96 samples) than the DNeasy PowerSoil protocol. The direct PCR method can also be fully automated and is compatible with small-volume samples, thereby permitting scaling of samples and replicates needed to support high-throughput large-scale bacterial community analysis.IMPORTANCE Understanding bacterial interactions and assembly in complex microbial communities using 16S rRNA sequencing normally requires a large experimental load. However, the current DNA extraction methods, including cell disruption and genomic DNA purification, are normally biased, costly, time-consuming, labor-intensive, and not amenable to miniaturization by droplets or 1,536-well plates due to the significant DNA loss during the purification step for tiny-volume and low-cell-density samples. A direct PCR method could potentially solve these problems. In this study, we developed a direct PCR method which exhibits similar efficiency as the widely used method, the DNeasy PowerSoil protocol, while being 1,600 times less expensive and 10 times faster to execute. This simple, cost-effective, and automation-friendly direct-PCR-based 16S rRNA sequencing method allows us to study the dynamics, microbial interaction, and assembly of various microbial communities in a high-throughput fashion.
Highlights
Bacterial communities in water, soil, and humans play an essential role in environmental ecology and human health
The accuracy and efficiency of the direct PCR methods increased from method 1 to method 3
The direct PCR method will solve this problem by keeping all the genomic DNA (gDNA) in the PCR without any loss
Summary
A Simple, Cost-Effective, and Automation-Friendly Direct PCR Approach for Bacterial Community Analysis. Arkina,b aEnvironmental Genomics & Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA bDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have