Abstract

Despite the need for large-scale retrofit of UK housing to meet emissions reduction targets, progress to date has been slow and domestic energy efficiency policies have struggled to accelerate housing retrofit processes. There is a need for housing retrofit policies that overcome key barriers within the retrofit sector while maintaining economic viability for customers, funding organizations, and effectively addressing UK emission reductions and fuel poverty targets. In this study, we use a simple assessment framework to assess three policies (the Variable Council Tax, the Variable Stamp Duty Land Tax, and Green Mortgage) proposed to replace the UK’s current major domestic retrofit programme known as the Energy Company Obligation (ECO). We show that the Variable Council Tax and Green Mortgage proposals have the greatest potential for overcoming the main barriers to retrofit policies while maintaining economic viability and contributing to high-level UK targets. We also show that, while none of the assessed schemes are capable of overcoming all retrofit barriers on their own, a mix of all three policies could address most barriers and provide key benefits such as wide coverage of property markets, operation on existing financial infrastructures, and application of a “carrot-and-stick” approach to incentivize retrofit. Lastly, we indicate that the specific support and protection of fuel-poor households cannot be achieved by a mix of these policies and a complementary scheme focused on fuel-poor households is required.

Highlights

  • With domestic buildings accounting for 30% of the UK’s final energy consumption [1] and 25% of UK carbon emissions [2], energy efficiency improvements in residential housing could deliver carbon savings of 24 Mt CO2 per annum by 2030 [3]

  • We propose a simple policy assessment framework to holistically assess the suitability of energy efficiency policies for overcoming barriers and meeting stakeholder needs in the UK housing and retrofit sectors

  • These assessments focus mainly on overcoming technological and economic barriers and rarely incorporate the barriers and opportunities perceived by factors in the sector [11] especially non-economic barriers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With domestic buildings accounting for 30% of the UK’s final energy consumption [1] and 25% of UK carbon emissions [2], energy efficiency improvements in residential housing could deliver carbon savings of 24 Mt CO2 per annum by 2030 [3]. In contrast [17], we developed a quantitative framework that assesses policies based on their compliance with the energy supplier obligation rationale (e.g., achieving actual energy savings or business model innovation) and alignment with policy success criteria (e.g., cost effectiveness or deliverability). These two different assessment frameworks could produce different outcomes when evaluating the same policy and neither uses a holistic approach to represent stakeholders operating in a complex system

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call