Abstract
Grain boundaries (GBs) have a significant influence on the properties of crystalline materials. Machine learning approaches present an attractive route to develop atomic structure-property models for GBs because of the complexity of their structure. However, the application of such techniques requires an appropriate descriptor of the atomic structure. Unfortunately, common crystal structure identification techniques cannot be applied to characterize the structure of the vast majority of GB atoms (50-98% are classified as other). This suggests a critical need for atomic structure descriptors capable of identifying arbitrary atomic environments. In this work we present a simple procedure that facilitates the identification of arbitrary atomic structures present in GBs. We apply this approach to characterize the atomic structure of the 388 GBs from the Olmsted data set (Olmsted 2009). We show how this approach facilitates visualization of GB atomic structures in a way that reveals important structural information. We test the recently proposed hypothesis that Σ3 GBs contain facets of the GBs that form the corners of the corresponding GB plane fundamental zone. Finally, we briefly demonstrate how the structure descriptors resulting from our approach can be used as inputs to machine learning approaches for the development of atomic structure-property models for GBs.
Highlights
Grain boundaries (GBs) play an important role for many material properties, such as hydrogen embrittlement (Bechtle et al, 2009), creep (Gertsman and Tangri, 1997; Watanabe et al, 2009), corrosion resistance (Shimada et al, 2002; Tan et al, 2008), and conductivity (Zhang et al, 2006)
This results in all of the non-face-centered cubic (FCC) atoms, as well as many FCC atoms inside or adjacent to the GB being identified with it
There are a total of 462,955 GB atoms, out of a total of 11,922,451 atoms contained in the Olmsted data set
Summary
Grain boundaries (GBs) play an important role for many material properties, such as hydrogen embrittlement (Bechtle et al, 2009), creep (Gertsman and Tangri, 1997; Watanabe et al, 2009), corrosion resistance (Shimada et al, 2002; Tan et al, 2008), and conductivity (Zhang et al, 2006). CNA, PTM, and Voronoi analysis methods all classify the atomic structure of an atom by comparison of its local environment to a library of known structures, usually face-centered cubic (FCC), hexagonal closepacked (HCP), body-centered cubic (BCC), icosahedral (ICO), and, for some of these methods, simple cubic (SC). These methods provide valuable tools for identifying the location, and in some cases the types, of defects present in an atomistic model. Additional environments can be added to these libraries, but this must be done manually
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.