Abstract

Over the past few decades, caring for special patients has taken center stage in healthcare systems. Moreover, what necessitates conducting a comparative study into the conditions of special patients and designing a suitable model are as follows: high admission rates of these patients in hospitals, continual recurrence of the illness, sky-high costs of treatment and medicine, lack of coordination between the services offered by hospitals and community needs, and severe pressure of special patients on their families. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the models of government support programs for special patients in Iran, the United Kingdom, the USA, Italy and Sweden through a descriptive-documentary method. The findings revealed that the Ministry of Health and Welfare and the private sector were the major providers of health services to special patients in most of the countries under study. It was also demonstrated that the services offered to special patients are jointly mainly funded by governments, associations, and non-governmental organizations and partially by insurance premiums and so forth. The results also indicated that the bulk of healthcare provision was shouldered by non-governmental sectors and the contribution of charitable people. Finally, it can be concluded that both health-related policies and the health of special patients can be closely honed and monitored through the formation of committees on the health of special patients at the Supreme Council of Health, the establishment of an office for special patients at the Vice-chancellery for Health at the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education, provision of decentralized services, and financing through taxation and contribution of charitable people and international organizations. [GMJ.2020;9:e1403]

Highlights

  • Over the past few decades, caring for special patients has taken center stage in healthcare systems

  • To overcome or minimize these issues, a social support program was introduced by Tenhoor and Turner (1998), in which special patients require more provisions than mere health services, and should they have access to comprehensive services, they can live their happy lives in societies [2]

  • The results of comparative studies demonstrated that the macro policies relating to the affairs of special patients in the countries under study were carried out by the Ministry of Health and Welfare or the highest health councils composing of representatives of ministries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the past few decades, caring for special patients has taken center stage in healthcare systems. The main source of financial healthcare is tax administration by federal, state, and regional governments whereas the rest is provided by patients themselves in the form of out-of-pocket payments and private health insurance. The USA does not have a coherent health system in terms of organizational structure because it consists of states that vary widely in terms of population, culture, and social customs For this reason, they differ in terms of health needs and healthcare, and there are no comprehensive national systems for the health insurance system in the country, and the healthcare system has been formed by a complex combination of individual and public payers (federal, state, and local). Public and specialized outpatient care services provided by public and private centers

Hospital inpatient services
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call