Abstract

This study emphasizes the necessity of the Harrod-neutral identification of technological progress for the models of economic growth, which use Cobb–Douglas production function and which are based on stability. Some of the important studies, which reviewed a balanced growth path or a steady state of the Solow model, assumed the nature of technological progress as Hicks-neutral rather than Harrod-neutral. In this work, we have reminded that Harrod-neutral is a better assumption for the nature of technological progress in such studies.

Highlights

  • Models of economic growth based on long-term equilibrium, which assumed the nature of technological progress as Hicksneutral cause the following contradiction: For the models of economic growth based on long-term equilibrium, if Hicksneutral technological change is assumed, the economy can never reach equilibrium; that is, long-term equilibrium cannot be established

  • Acikgoz and Mert (2014) further emphasized the importance of this assumption for time-series econometric analysis. This present study aims to emphasize that the nature of technological progress should be assumed rather than Harrod-neutral for mathematical models of economic growth, which are based on stability

  • Proposition 1: If it is assumed that the nature of technological progress is Hicks-neutral, the level of technology should be constant for stability; that is, the level of technology cannot change over time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Models of economic growth based on long-term equilibrium, which assumed the nature of technological progress as Hicksneutral cause the following contradiction: For the models of economic growth based on long-term equilibrium, if Hicksneutral technological change is assumed, the economy can never reach equilibrium; that is, long-term equilibrium cannot be established. This present study aims to emphasize that the nature of technological progress should be assumed rather than Harrod-neutral for mathematical models of economic growth, which are based on stability. Equation 7 gives the capital–labor ratio at the steady state, when the nature of technological progress is defined as the Hicks-neutral.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.