Abstract

Intraspecific competition influences population and community dynamics and occurs via two mechanisms. Exploitative competition is an indirect effect that occurs through use of a shared resource and depends on resource availability. Interference competition occurs by obstructing access to a resource and may not depend on resource availability. Our study tested whether the strength of interference competition changes with protozoa population density. We grew experimental microcosms of protozoa and bacteria under different combinations of protozoan density and basal resource availability. We then solved a dynamic predator–prey model for parameters of the functional response using population growth rates measured in our experiment. As population density increased, competition shifted from exploitation to interference, and competition was less dependent on resource levels. Surprisingly, the effect of resources was weakest when competition was the most intense. We found that at low population densities, competition was largely exploitative and resource availability had a large effect on population growth rates, but the effect of resources was much weaker at high densities. This shift in competitive mechanism could have implications for interspecific competition, trophic interactions, community diversity, and natural selection. We also tested whether this shift in the mechanism of competition with protozoa density affected the structure of the bacterial prey community. We found that both resources and protozoa density affected the structure of the bacterial prey community, suggesting that competitive mechanism may also affect trophic interactions.

Highlights

  • Intraspecific competition is a major factor driving population dynamics (Schoener 1973), often outweighing the effects of interspecific competition (Connell 1983; de Villemereuil and Lopez-Sepulcre 2011)

  • Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

  • Population growth rates decreased with decreasing resources and increasing population densities, suggesting that Colpidium populations experience resource limitation and intraspecific competition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intraspecific competition is a major factor driving population dynamics (Schoener 1973), often outweighing the effects of interspecific competition (Connell 1983; de Villemereuil and Lopez-Sepulcre 2011). Aboveground competition in a native perennial grass, Schizachyrium scoparium, was most intense where light was limiting and decreased significantly as light availability increased (Wilson and Tilman 1993). In a temperate herb population, Chenopodium album, competition was most intense when both light availability and nitrogen availability were highest, but was less intense when one or both of these resources were limiting (Nicotra and Rodenhouse 1995). Plant biomass was highest in environments that produced the most intense competition (Nicotra and Rodenhouse 1995). This counterintuitive effect of increased resources could occur because some a 2016 The Authors.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call