Abstract

Intellectuals of the 20th century bore witness to society’s injustices. They viewed and commented on erosion of rights and humankind’s callousness to itself. For example, Huxley’s Brave New World and Brave New World Revisited illustrate with contempt a society that had renounced personal individuality and rejected freedom, choosing a drugged totalitarian state set adrift from any sense of morality. Huxley’s work is a familiar touchstone, in that it presupposed a world that seems increasingly real to us, even though a faithful portrayal of the future was hardly Huxley’s intent. Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 soberly reminded the world of the wages of intolerance to divergent ideas, in envisioning a government solidifying its hold on power by banishing the spectrum of human emotion in literature and mass media. Forster’s ambitious short story “The Machine Stops” countered the naiveté of a positive equal utopia, with a world cruel in its homogenization and dependent on a deified machine for all facets of its existence. In each instance, government is an ominous, questionable character. Technology, in these texts and in today’s world, is a foundational element with muddled aims—a rich virtual society on one hand, but frightening levels of assimilation, control, and loss of interpersonal communication and privacy in the crumbling arena of the real on the other. In this article, a future technology-led existence is examined through the lenses of these fictional works.

Highlights

  • Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety

  • It can be a tool with great potential for the sharing of knowledge, as in Lyotard’s view

  • To Lyotard, free access to information technology is a facilitator to the development of local narrative and essential to the increase of meaning and understanding throughout a larger society

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. The role of government might be threefold: control of populations through rules, as suggested by Tocqueville; regularization of identities in a manner that limits individual boundaries, limiting opportunities for destabilization; and stabilization of relations among people and groups through various forms of intervention, policy, and otherwise.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.