Abstract
By analyzing and systematizing the literature accumulated over the past twenty years on the history of reforms, we can put in order the existing views on the processes that took place during these transformations and de ne a new vector in understanding the socio-economic development of Russia in the last decade of the 20th century and the rst decades of the 21st century. The rst step in this direction is the analysis of publications that re ect the preparation, progress and results of the contemporary economic reforms in the 1990s. The historiographic review includes the monographs written both by the advocates of the shock therapy, and their opponents and critics, rst of all, Members of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The study of this literature allows to reveal the spectrum of opinions on whether the shock therapy was the preferred version of transformations, on assessing the results of reforms by the end of the 1990s and the opportunities for alternative ways to make the transition from a planned to a market economy. In particular, the advocates of the «shock therapy» refer to the threat of famine and civil war to justify decisions that led to decline in output, hyperin ation and other negative trends. Their critics point out that the lack of public support caused the market reforms to fail. By acknowledging the obvious, i. e. a signi cant deterioration of economic indicators, the advocates see their success in establishing the system of market institutions, and, on this basis, insist there was no alternative to implemented version of reforms. In turn, their opponents believe that the alternatives to the «shock therapy» existed, and their distinctive feature would have been the gradual cultivation and not the forced administrative introduction of market economy institutions.
Highlights
Introduction, or Why We Need a Problem Historiography. Strange as it may seem, the 20th anniversary marking the beginning of market reforms in the Russian economy went almost unnoticed at the official level
If we draw a parallel with a well-known quote of Yury Andropov about not knowing the society in which the Soviet people lived in the first half of the 1980s, it would be necessary to recognize that, even among the experts, there is no understanding of what was the direction of transformations in the economy of modern Russia, how to evaluate their results, whether the reforms are still going on and, if not, when they were completed
All too often, these attempts came down to compiling the lists of authors allegedly involved in studying the history of reforms in the Russian economy at the turn of the 21st century
Summary
Strange as it may seem, the 20th anniversary marking the beginning of market reforms in the Russian economy (if we start counting from January 2, 1992, a day when the decree on liberalization of prices entered into force) went almost unnoticed at the official level.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.