Abstract
This essay considers the role of feminist legal theories in confronting the continuing issue of service. Part one discusses MRS. WOOLF AND THE SERVANTS: AN INTIMATE HISTORY OF DOMESTIC LIFE IN BLOOMSBURY by Alison Light, including both the particularities and larger social aspects of Virginia Woolf's employment of workers. Part two examines Long Island Care at Home v. Coke, in which the United States Supreme Court upheld a regulation that exempted certain employees in domestic service from minimum and overtime wage laws even if they were hired by a company rather than a household. Part three considers the trial and proceedings in US v. Sabhani, in which the United States prosecuted and a jury convicted a woman and a man for forced labor and document servitude of two women from Indonesia. In the last section, the essay compares the situations of Virginia Woolf and her servants, Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. and its servants, and Varsha Sabhnani and her servants. The essay argues that any relationship categorized as and master, even when the master is a mistress, and even when the master/servant dichotomy is viewed as a relatively equal contractual relationship rather than one based on status, is deeply problematical. The essay further argues that this servant problem needs much more feminist attention.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
