Abstract

Original data envelopment analysis models treat decision-making units as independent entities. This feature of data envelopment analysis results in significant diversity in input and output weights, which is irrelevant and problematic from the managerial point of view. In this regard, several methodologies have been developed to measure the efficiency scores based on common weights. Specifically, Ruiz and Sirvant (Omega 65:1–9, 2016) formulated an aggregated DEA model to minimize the gap between actual performances and best practices and identify a common best practice frontier. Their model is capable of determining target units for all units under evaluation, simultaneously, with the property that all of them are located on a common best practice frontier. However, in practice it is difficult for some units to achieve that specified target in a single step. Consequently, developing a methodology for assisting units to reach their corresponding targets, through a path of intermediate improving targets, is useful. This problem is investigated in this paper, and we propose a stepwise target setting approach which provides a path of intermediate targets for each unit. We study efficient and inefficient units separately and provide two distinct models for each category, although both of them are intrinsically similar. A simple numerical example and an application are also provided to illustrate our approach.

Highlights

  • Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a nonparametric linear programming-based technique first developed by Charnes et al (1978) for evaluating the performance of homogeneous decision-making units (DMUs) having multiple inputs and multiple outputs

  • The first research on this subject was developed by Frei and Harker (1999), who have investigated the issue of benchmarking based on projecting inefficient units onto the strongly efficient frontier of DEA, considering Euclidean distance

  • One of the main features of DEA is that it can be used for benchmarking, which is an important issue in management and economics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a nonparametric linear programming-based technique first developed by Charnes et al (1978) for evaluating the performance of homogeneous decision-making units (DMUs) having multiple inputs and multiple outputs. This study was recently supplemented by Rubem et al (2017) who introduced a weighted goal programming formulation to solve the MCDEA problem Another basic approach to improve the discrimination power of DEA is to determine a common set of weights for all units under assessment. Ruiz and Sirvant (2016) formulated a model of CSW in the framework of benchmarking, i.e., they formulated a program to globally minimize a weighted L1-distance of all the units to their corresponding benchmarks which are located on a common hyperplane of the DEA technology In this regard, they suggested that only a facet of the DEA technology should be considered as the best practice frontier.

Difficulties in common benchmarking
Unit x y
Developing a benchmark path toward the common best practice frontier
Proof We have
Computational complexity
Numerical example
AIR CANADA
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call