Abstract

BackgroundHot spots are residues contributing the most of binding free energy yet accounting for a small portion of a protein interface. Experimental approaches to identify hot spots such as alanine scanning mutagenesis are expensive and time-consuming, while computational methods are emerging as effective alternatives to experimental approaches.ResultsIn this study, we propose a semi-supervised boosting SVM, which is called sbSVM, to computationally predict hot spots at protein-protein interfaces by combining protein sequence and structure features. Here, feature selection is performed using random forests to avoid over-fitting. Due to the deficiency of positive samples, our approach samples useful unlabeled data iteratively to boost the performance of hot spots prediction. The performance evaluation of our method is carried out on a dataset generated from the ASEdb database for cross-validation and a dataset from the BID database for independent test. Furthermore, a balanced dataset with similar amounts of hot spots and non-hot spots (65 and 66 respectively) derived from the first training dataset is used to further validate our method. All results show that our method yields good sensitivity, accuracy and F1 score comparing with the existing methods.ConclusionOur method boosts prediction performance of hot spots by using unlabeled data to overcome the deficiency of available training data. Experimental results show that our approach is more effective than the traditional supervised algorithms and major existing hot spot prediction methods.

Highlights

  • Hot spots are residues contributing the most of binding free energy yet accounting for a small portion of a protein interface

  • It is well known that the binding free energy is not uniformly distributed over the protein interfaces, and a small portion of interface residues contribute the most of binding free energy instead [11]

  • Our method is based on a semi-supervised boosting framework that samples some useful unlabeled data at each iteration to improve the performance of the underlying classifier (SVM in this paper)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hot spots are residues contributing the most of binding free energy yet accounting for a small portion of a protein interface. Experimental approaches to identify hot spots such as alanine scanning mutagenesis are expensive and time-consuming, while computational methods are emerging as effective alternatives to experimental approaches. It is well known that the binding free energy is not uniformly distributed over the protein interfaces, and a small portion of interface residues contribute the most of binding free energy instead [11]. These residues are termed as hot spots.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call