Abstract

BackgroundUltra-processed foods are recognized as indicators of an unhealthy diet in epidemiological studies. In addition to ultra-processed foods, the NOVA food classification system identifies three other groups with less processing. Unprocessed foods that, together with minimally processed foods (MPF), make NOVA group 1, NOVA group 2 is processed culinary ingredients, and NOVA group 3 is processed foods.ObjectiveTo assess the relative validity of the semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ) to estimate the energy intake for each group NOVA classification system by comparing it with two 24 h-dietary-recall (24DRs) Mexican adults.MethodsWe analyzed dietary information from 226 adults included <60 and ≥60 years with complete SFFQ and two 24DRs from the National Health and Nutrition Survey 2012. We reported mean differences, Spearman correlation coefficients, intra-class correlations coefficients, Bland–Altman plots, and weighted kappa between measures.ResultsThe percentage energy intake from unprocessed and minimally processed foods group, Spearman correlation coefficients was 0.54 in adults <60 years and 0.42 in adults ≥60 years, while ultra-processed foods group was 0.67 and 0.48, respectively. The intra-class correlation coefficients in the unprocessed and minimally processed foods group was 0.51 in adults <60 years and 0.46 in adults ≥60 years, and for the ultra-processed foods group were 0.71 and 0.50, respectively. Bland–Altman plots indicated reasonably consistent agreement for unprocessed and minimally processed foods group and ultra-processed foods group in adults <60 years and adults in the ≥60 age group. Weighted kappa was 0.45 in the ultra-processed foods group to adults <60 years and was 0.36–≥60 years.ConclusionThe SFFQ had acceptable validity to rank the percentage of energy intake from unprocessed and minimally processed foods group and ultra-processed foods group in Mexican adults, both in adults under 60 years and who were 60 years old or older.

Highlights

  • In epidemiological studies, ultra-processed foods are recognized as an unhealthy diet indicator [1–12]

  • The semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ) underestimated the processed culinary ingredients group (%kappa showed acceptable agreement in energy intake (Kcal) = −6.4 95% CI = −7.1, −5.6)

  • The SFFQ overestimated the unprocessed and minimally processed foods group (%Kcal = 4.2, 95% CI = 2.1, 6.4) and processed foods group (%Kcal = 1.7, 95% CI = 0.3, 3.2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ultra-processed foods are recognized as an unhealthy diet indicator [1–12]. Unprocessed and minimally processed foods make up NOVA group 1, NOVA group 2 is processed culinary ingredients, and NOVA group 3 is processed foods [13]. Instruments such as 24-h recall (24DR) or dietary records have been used to measure food intake for each NOVA classification group [15]. These are open-ended, including very detailed information that can collect information on the type of processing [14, 17]. Unprocessed foods that, together with minimally processed foods (MPF), make NOVA group 1, NOVA group 2 is processed culinary ingredients, and NOVA group 3 is processed foods

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call