Abstract

Neural models have achieved great success on machine reading comprehension (MRC), many of which typically consist of two components: an evidence extractor and an answer predictor. The former seeks the most relevant information from a reference text, while the latter is to locate or generate answers from the extracted evidence. Despite the importance of evidence labels for training the evidence extractor, they are not cheaply accessible, particularly in many non-extractive MRC tasks such as YES/NO question answering and multi-choice MRC. To address this problem, we present a Self-Training method (STM), which supervises the evidence extractor with auto-generated evidence labels in an iterative process. At each iteration, a base MRC model is trained with golden answers and noisy evidence labels. The trained model will predict pseudo evidence labels as extra supervision in the next iteration. We evaluate STM on seven datasets over three MRC tasks. Experimental results demonstrate the improvement on existing MRC models, and we also analyze how and why such a self-training method works in MRC.

Highlights

  • Machine reading comprehension (MRC) has received increasing attention recently, which can be roughly divided into two categories: extractive and non-extractive MRC

  • BERT-HA+Rule performed worse than BERT-HA on CoQA and MARCO, implying that it is more difficult for the rulebased methods to find correct evidence in these two datasets

  • BERTHA+SelfTraining method (STM) achieved comparable performance with BERT-HA+Gold, which stands for the upper bound by providing golden evidence labels, indicating that the effectiveness of noisy labels in our method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Machine reading comprehension (MRC) has received increasing attention recently, which can be roughly divided into two categories: extractive and non-extractive MRC. Some recent efforts have been dedicated to improving MRC by leveraging noisy evidence labels when training the evidence extractor. Some studies (Wang et al, 2018; Choi et al, 2017) adopt reinforcement learning (RL) to decide the labels of evidence. Such RL methods suffer from unstable training. Improving the evidence extractor remains challenging when golden evidence labels are not available

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call