Abstract

The purpose of the present research was to investigate how leaders’ different types of pretraining motivation may influence transfer of leadership training. Drawing on self-determination theory, we examined the role of autonomous and controlled motivation for short- and long-term transfer in terms of employee-rated improvements of leaders’ need support. Data were collected in conjunction with a leadership training program that was aimed at increasing need support among municipality leaders ( n = 20 leaders and their n = 323 employees), and surveys were sent to leaders and employees before training, posttraining, and 4 months after training. Bayesian multilevel modeling suggests that autonomous (Estimate = 0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI: 0.030, 0.329]) and controlled (Estimate = 0.08, 95% CI [0.013, 0.150]) premotivation among leaders are related to short-term improvements in need support. Although neither type of motivation had a credible long-term effect on transfer 4 months after the training, the 95% credibility interval indicate that the effect of autonomous motivation (Estimate = 0.13, 95% CI [−0.004, 0.269]) most likely is positive. Our study demonstrates the usefulness of using a theory-based multidimensional perspective on predictors of training transfer and on adding a temporal perceptive on their effects. Our study also points toward the importance of not only fostering autonomous motivation at work but recognizing the potential in controlled motivation.

Highlights

  • A recent meta-analysis suggests that leadership training leads to improvements in leader reaction, learning, transfer, and organizational results (Lacerenza et al, 2017)

  • We examine how pretraining autonomous motivation is related to long-term transfer in terms of improvement in leadership behavior 4 months after the training ended and suggest the following: Hypothesis 2: Autonomous pretraining motivation will be a positive predictor of long-term transfer of leadership training

  • Based on self-determination theory (SDT) and empirical research suggesting that autonomous motivation is related to more favorable outcomes compared with controlled motivation (Gagné & Deci, 2005), we suggest the following: Hypothesis 3

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A recent meta-analysis suggests that leadership training leads to improvements in leader reaction, learning, transfer, and organizational results (Lacerenza et al, 2017). A number of studies have examined if leadership training transfers, and a recently published meta-analysis found that leadership training does transfer, but more so for skill-based outcomes compared with affective outcomes or job-performance gains (Lacerenza et al, 2017). This is in line with previous meta-analyses, which have shown that leadership training has a positive impact on leadership behavior across a wide range of theories, outcomes, leadership levels, and organization types (e.g., Avolio et al, 2009). Another factor that is important to consider is trainee characteristics, such as trainee motivation (Alliger et al, 1997; Baldwin & Ford, 1988; Blume et al, 2010)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call