Abstract
This paper presents a new representation and technique for proving theorems automatically that is both computationally more effective than resolution and permits a clear and concise formal description. A problem in automatic theorem proving can be specified by a set of clauses, containing literals, that represents a set of axioms and the negation of a theorem to be proved. The set of clauses can be replaced by a graph in which the nodes represent literals and the edges link unifiable complements. The nodes are partitioned by clause membership, and the edges are labeled with a most general unifying substitution. Given this representation, theorem proving becomes a graph-searching problem. The search technique presented here, in effect, unrolls the graph into sets of solution trees. The trees grow in a well-defined breadth-first way that defines a measure of proof complexity.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.