Abstract
A cross-modal priming experiment was conducted to test the hypothesis that lexical access of verbs marked with a specific inflectional suffix would be facilitated by immediately prior exposure to semantically and contextually unrelated verbs with the same suffix. It was hypothesized that while listening to spoken -ed sentences, subjects would respond more quickly to target words in the -ed form than in the -s or bare root form. Subjects were 15 university students, all native speakers of English, who responded to 60 visually presented target words, all based on one-syllable verb roots, while listening to aurally presented sentences of two types, one with and one without -ed verb morphology to provide a past tense environment. The predicted priming did not occur. Instead, bare root forms showed an absolute advantage over inflected forms in this experimental paradigm. However, an unanticipated finding was that responses to inflected forms were affected by the kind of discourse that was being attended to auditorily at the time of the visual lexical decision. There was no such effect of discourse context on responses on uninflected verbs. Results lend some support to the view that inflection triggers discourse integration. Contains 37 references. (MSE) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. A Search for Inflectional Priming Reveals an Effect of Discourse Type on the Lexical Access of Inflected Verbs PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.