Abstract

Abstract We report on a search for fast radio bursts (FRBs) with the Green Bank Northern Celestial Cap (GBNCC) Pulsar Survey at 350 MHz. Pointings amounting to a total on-sky time of 61 days were searched to a dispersion measure (DM) of 3000 pc cm−3, while the rest (23 days; 29% of the total time) were searched to a DM of 500 pc cm−3. No FRBs were detected in the pointings observed through 2016 May. We estimate a 95% confidence upper limit on the FRB rate of FRBs sky−1 day−1 above a peak flux density of 0.63 Jy at 350 MHz for an intrinsic pulse width of 5 ms. We place constraints on the spectral index α by running simulations for different astrophysical scenarios and cumulative flux density distributions. The nondetection with GBNCC is consistent with the 1.4 GHz rate reported for the Parkes surveys for α > +0.35 in the absence of scattering and free–free absorption and α > −0.3 in the presence of scattering, for a Euclidean flux distribution. The constraints imply that FRBs exhibit either a flat spectrum or a spectral turnover at frequencies above 400 MHz. These constraints also allow estimation of the number of bursts that can be detected with current and upcoming surveys. We predict that CHIME may detect anywhere from several to ∼50 FRBs per day (depending on model assumptions), making it well suited for interesting constraints on spectral index, the log N–log S slope, and pulse profile evolution across its bandwidth (400–800 MHz).

Highlights

  • Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are bright, millisecond-duration events occurring in the radio sky

  • We report on a search for fast radio bursts (FRBs) with the Green Bank Northern Celestial Cap (GBNCC) Pulsar Survey at 350 MHz

  • The mean limiting redshift for the GBNCC pointings reduces to zlim = 1.79, if we assume DMhost to be equal to the upper limit on the inferred dispersion measure (DM) of the host galaxy of FRB121102 (225 pc cm−3)

Read more

Summary

A Search for Fast Radio Bursts with the GBNCC Pulsar Survey

Citation for published version (APA): Chawla, P., Kaspi, V. Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. It is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. M. Rajwade[2,3], D. K. Swiggum[8 ], and J. van Leeuwen[5,7]. Received 2017 January 8; revised 2017 June 26; accepted 2017 June 30; published 2017 August 1

Introduction
Survey Description
Survey Sensitivity
Analysis
RRATtrap
RRATtrap Sensitivity
Modifications to RRATtrap
Visual Inspection
Estimation of Sky Rate
Estimation of Volumetric Rate
Spectral Index Constraints
Absence of Scattering and Free–Free Absorption
Scattering
Constant Comoving Number Density Distribution
Implications for Other Surveys
Predictions for CHIME
Findings
Summary and Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call