Abstract
The publication of Frederick C. Corey and Thomas K. Nakayama's “Sextext” in Text and Performance Quarterly provoked an extended and often heated discussion in the online publication CRTNET in January, February, and March 1997. The discussion, which ranged widely beyond “Sextext” itself, saw complaints about performance studies, postmodern scholarship and theory, autoethnography, pornography, the discipline's standards of scholarship and editorial practices, and implicitly, some later alleged, homophobic anxieties.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
