Abstract

Cancer mutations in Ras occur predominantly at three hotspots: Gly 12, Gly 13, and Gln 61. Previously, we reported that deep mutagenesis of H-Ras using a bacterial assay identified many other activating mutations (Bandaru et al., 2017). We now show that the results of saturation mutagenesis of H-Ras in mammalian Ba/F3 cells correlate well with the results of bacterial experiments in which H-Ras or K-Ras are co-expressed with a GTPase-activating protein (GAP). The prominent cancer hotspots are not dominant in the Ba/F3 data. We used the bacterial system to mutagenize Ras constructs of different stabilities and discovered a feature that distinguishes the cancer hotspots. While mutations at the cancer hotspots activate Ras regardless of construct stability, mutations at lower-frequency sites (e.g. at Val 14 or Asp 119) can be activating or deleterious, depending on the stability of the Ras construct. We characterized the dynamics of three non-hotspot activating Ras mutants by using NMR to monitor hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX). These mutations result in global increases in HDX rates, consistent with destabilization of Ras. An explanation for these observations is that mutations that destabilize Ras increase nucleotide dissociation rates, enabling activation by spontaneous nucleotide exchange. A further stability decrease can lead to insufficient levels of folded Ras - and subsequent loss of function. In contrast, the cancer hotspot mutations are mechanism-based activators of Ras that interfere directly with the action of GAPs. Our results demonstrate the importance of GAP surveillance and protein stability in determining the sensitivity of Ras to mutational activation.

Highlights

  • The small GTPase Ras (Figure 1A) cycles between active GTP-bound and inactiveGDP-bound states (Figure 1B) (Wittinghofer and Vetter, 2011)

  • We show that the results of saturation mutagenesis of H-Ras in mammalian Ba/F3 cells correlate well with results of bacterial experiments in which H-Ras or K-Ras are co-expressed with a GTPase-activating protein (GAP)

  • GTP-bound Ras binds to the Ras-binding domains (RBDs) of effector proteins, such as Raf kinases and PI-3 kinase (PI3K), triggering signaling cascades that result in cell proliferation (Ehrhardt et al, 2002; Pylayeva-Gupta et al, 2011; Schubbert et al, 2007)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The small GTPase Ras (Figure 1A) cycles between active GTP-bound and inactive. GDP-bound states (Figure 1B) (Wittinghofer and Vetter, 2011). GTP-bound Ras binds to the Ras-binding domains (RBDs) of effector proteins, such as Raf kinases and PI-3 kinase (PI3K), triggering signaling cascades that result in cell proliferation (Ehrhardt et al, 2002; Pylayeva-Gupta et al, 2011; Schubbert et al, 2007). Ras activity is controlled by two kinds of regulators: GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) and guanine nucleotide-exchange factors (GEFs). GAPs stimulate the hydrolysis of GTP, thereby converting Ras to the inactive GDP-bound state (Ahmadian et al, 1997). Spontaneous exchange of GDP for GTP is slow, and nucleotide exchange and re-activation of Ras is accelerated by GEFs (Bandaru et al, 2019; Boriack-Sjodin et al, 1998; Ehrhardt et al, 2002; Harrison et al, 2016; Vetter and Wittinghofer, 2001)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call