Abstract

Impulsivity generally refers to a deficit in inhibition, with a focus on understanding the neural circuits which constitute the “brake” on actions and gratification. It is likely that increased impulsivity can arise not only from reduced inhibition, but also from a heightened or exaggerated excitatory “drive.” For example, an action which has more vigor, or is fueled by either increased incentive salience or a stronger action-outcome association, may be harder to inhibit. From this perspective, this review focuses on impulse control as a competition over behavioral output between an initially learned response-reward outcome association, and a subsequently acquired opposing inhibitory association. Our goal is to present a synthesis of research from humans and animal models that supports this dual-systems approach to understanding the behavioral and neural substrates that contribute to impulsivity, with a focus on the neuromodulatory role of serotonin. We review evidence for the role of serotonin signaling in mediating the balance of the “drive” and “brake” circuits. Additionally, we consider parallels of these competing instrumental systems in impulsivity within classical conditioning processes (e.g., extinction) in order to point us to potential behavioral and neural mechanisms that may modulate the competing instrumental associations. Finally, we consider how the balance of these competing associations might contribute to, or be extracted from, our experimental assessments of impulsivity. A careful understanding of the underlying behavioral and circuit level contributions to impulsivity is important for understanding the pathogenesis of increased impulsivity present in a number of psychiatric disorders. Pathological levels of impulsivity in such disorders are likely subserved by deficits in the balance of motivational and inhibitory processes.

Highlights

  • Impulsivity is generally conceived of as a deficit in inhibitory control, resulting in unwanted actions

  • We focus on the action component of impulsivity, exploring the idea that impulse control can be broadly described as competing circuits

  • We focus on serotoninergic modulation of the underlying neural circuitry of both reward processing and inhibitory control, and potentially in determining the balance of these competing systems to generate the output impulsive behavior

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Impulsivity is generally conceived of as a deficit in inhibitory control, resulting in unwanted actions. Impulsive behavior has many diverse presentations and complex neurobiological underpinnings (Dalley and Robbins, 2017; Strickland and Johnson, 2021). Many lines of work have fractionated impulsivity into a number of different subtypes and components, with dissociable. Serotonin Contribution to Impulsivity biological bases (Winstanley et al, 2004; Robbins et al, 2012; Bari and Robbins, 2013; MacKillop et al, 2016; Dalley and Robbins, 2017; Nautiyal et al, 2017; Bailey et al, 2021). Impulsive choice is described as risky decision making, including discounting of delayed rewards. We focus on the action component of impulsivity, exploring the idea that impulse control can be broadly described as competing circuits. We highlight the role of serotonin signaling in modulating these oppositional circuits in the control of impulsive action

Objectives
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call