Abstract
IntroductionThere is limited data available on the use of CPET as a predictive tool for disease outcomes in the setting of IPF. We investigated the feasibility of undertaking CPET and the relationship between CPET and quality of life measurements in a well-defined population of mild and moderate IPF patients.MethodsA prospective, single-centre observational study.ResultsThirty-two IPF patients (mild n = 23, moderate n = 9) participated in the study, n = 13 mild patients attended for repeat CPET testing at 12 months. At baseline, total K-BILD scores and total IPF-PROM scores significantly correlated with 6MWT distance, but not with baseline FVC % predicted, TLco % predicted, baseline or minimum SpO2. VO2 peak/kg at AT positively correlated with total scores, breathlessness/activity and chest domains of the K-BILD questionnaire (p < 0.05). VO2 peak significantly correlated with total IPF PROM scores and wellbeing domains (p < 0.05), with a trend towards statistical significance for total IPF-PROM and VO2 peak/kg at anaerobic threshold (p = 0.06).There was a statistically significant reduction in FVC% predicted at 12 months follow up, although the mean absolute decline was < 10% (p < 0.05). During this period VO2 peak significantly reduced (21.6 ml/kg/min ± 2.9 vs 19.1 ± 2.8; p = 0.017), with corresponding reductions in total K-BILD and breathlessness/activity domains that exceeded the MCID for responsiveness. Lower baseline VO2 peak/kg at anaerobic threshold correlated with greater declines in total K-BILD scores (r = − 0.62, 0.024) at 12 months. Whilst baseline FVC% predicted or TLco % predicted did not predict change in health status,ConclusionWe have shown that it is feasible to undertake CPET in patients with mild to moderate IPF.CPET measures of VO2 peak correlated with both baseline and change in K-BILD measurements at 1 year, despite relatively stable standard lung function (declines of < 10% in FVC), suggesting its potential sensitivity to detect physiological changes underlying health status.
Highlights
There is limited data available on the use of Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) as a predictive tool for disease outcomes in the setting of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)
We have investigated the feasibility of undertaking CPET in a population of mild and moderate IPF patients in terms of the attrition of participants, information on safety data, and willingness to engage with the study protocol
Lower baseline VO2 peak/kg at anaerobic threshold correlated with greater declines in total King’s Brief ILD questionnaire (K-BILD) scores (r = − 0.62, 0.024) and psychological domains of the K-BILD at follow up (r = − 0.63, p = 0.022)
Summary
In the setting of large-scale clinical trials, a decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) has been used as a primary outcome measure [6, 7] and as a surrogate for mortality, this has not been universally endorsed [8, 9]. There is limited data available on the use of CPET as a predictive tool for disease outcomes in the setting of IPF. A recent systematic review identified only two small-scale prospective studies that investigated the role of CPET in the prognostication in IPF [13, 14] and concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support its use in facilitating ‘real world’ clinical decisions at the current time
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
