Abstract

Abstract. Landslides are among the major threats to urban landscape and manmade infrastructure. They often cause economic losses, property damages, and loss of lives. Temporal monitoring data of landslides from different epochs empowers the evaluation of landslide progression. Alignment of overlapping surfaces from two or more epochs is crucial for the proper analysis of landslide dynamics. The traditional methods for point-cloud-based landslide monitoring rely on using a variation of the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) registration procedure to align any reconstructed surfaces from different epochs to a common reference frame. However, sometimes the ICP-based registration can fail or may not provide sufficient accuracy. For example, point clouds from different epochs might fit to local minima due to lack of geometrical variability within the data. Also, manual interaction is required to exclude any non-stable areas from the registration process. In this paper, a robust image-based registration method is introduced for the simultaneous evaluation of all registration parameters. This includes the Interior Orientation Parameters (IOPs) of the camera and the Exterior Orientation Parameters (EOPs) of the involved images from all available observation epochs via a bundle block adjustment with self-calibration. Next, a semi-global dense matching technique is implemented to generate dense 3D point clouds for each epoch using the images captured in a particular epoch separately. The normal distances between any two consecutive point clouds can then be readily computed, because the point clouds are already effectively co-registered. A low-cost DJI Phantom II Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) was customised and used in this research for temporal data collection over an active soil creep area in Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada. The customisation included adding a GPS logger and a Large-Field-Of-View (LFOV) action camera which facilitated capturing high-resolution geo-tagged images in two epochs over the period of one year (i.e., May 2014 and May 2015). Note that due to the coarse accuracy of the on-board GPS receiver (e.g., +/- 5-10 m) the geo-tagged positions of the images were only used as initial values in the bundle block adjustment. Normal distances, signifying detected changes, varying from 20 cm to 4 m were identified between the two epochs. The accuracy of the co-registered surfaces was estimated by comparing non-active patches within the monitored area of interest. Since these non-active sub-areas are stationary, the computed normal distances should theoretically be close to zero. The quality control of the registration results showed that the average normal distance was approximately 4 cm, which is within the noise level of the reconstructed surfaces.

Highlights

  • Change detection is the process of identifying differences and/or geometrical changes in the state of an object or a phenomenon over a specified period of time (Singh, 1989)

  • The registration approaches found within the literature can be categorized into the following: (1) target-based methods; (2) feature-based methods; (3) direct geo-referencing methods that are based on GNSS/INS (El-Sheimy, 2005; Habib et al, 2010; Wikinson and Mohamed, 2010; Wen et al, 2014; Schuhmacher and Böhm, 2005); and (4) surface/point cloud matching techniques using all available point clouds (i.e., the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) method and its variants) (Besl and McKay,1992; Al-Manasir and Fraser, 2006; Chen and Medioni, 1991; Salvi et al, 2007; Bae and Lichti, 2008; Schürch et al, 2011; Habib et al, 2010; Al-Durgham and Habib, 2013; Gruen and Akca, 2005)

  • Each autonomous flight was planned at an altitude of 25-30 m above ground level (AGL) at a speed of 5 m/s for each of the four flight missions (Figure 2; Table 1) during the two separate field campaigns at an active soil creep site in Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Change detection is the process of identifying differences and/or geometrical changes in the state of an object or a phenomenon over a specified period of time (Singh, 1989). The registration approaches found within the literature can be categorized into the following: (1) target-based methods; (2) feature-based methods; (3) direct geo-referencing methods that are based on GNSS/INS (El-Sheimy, 2005; Habib et al, 2010; Wikinson and Mohamed, 2010; Wen et al, 2014; Schuhmacher and Böhm, 2005); and (4) surface/point cloud matching techniques using all available point clouds (i.e., the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) method and its variants) (Besl and McKay,1992; Al-Manasir and Fraser, 2006; Chen and Medioni, 1991; Salvi et al, 2007; Bae and Lichti, 2008; Schürch et al, 2011; Habib et al, 2010; Al-Durgham and Habib, 2013; Gruen and Akca, 2005) Each of these various alternatives possesses their own advantages and disadvantages

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call