Abstract

The Hilbert–Huang transform (HHT) includes two procedures. First, empirical mode decomposition (EMD) is used to decompose signals into several intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) before the Hilbert transform (HT) of these IMFs are calculated. Compared to the conventional Hilbert transform (HT), HHT is more sensitive to thickness variations of seismic beds. However, random noise in seismic signal may cause the mixture of the modes from HHT. The recent ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) presents the advantages in decreasing mode mixture and has the promising potential in seismic signal analysis. Currently, EEMD is mainly used in seismic spectral decomposition and noise attenuation. We extend the application of EEMD based instantaneous frequency to the analysis of bed thickness. The tests on complex Marmousi2 model and a 2D field data show that EEMD is more effective in weakening mode mixtures contained in the IMFs, compared with that calculated by EMD. Furthermore, the EEMD based instantaneous frequency is more sensitive to the seismic thickness variation than that based on EMD and more consistent with the stratigraphic structure, which means that E-IFPs are more advantageous in characterizing reservoirs.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.