Abstract

AbstractDual optimization algorithms for the topology optimization of continuum structures in discrete variables are gaining popularity in recent times since, in topology design problems, the number of constraints is small in comparison to the number of design variables. Good topologies can be obtained for the minimum compliance design problem when the perimeter constraint is imposed in addition to the volume constraint. However, when the perimeter constraint is relaxed, the dual algorithm tends to give bad results, even with the use of higher‐order finite element models as we demonstrate in this work. Since, a priori, one does not know what a good value of the perimeter to be specified is, it is essential to have an algorithm which generates good topologies even in the absence of the perimeter constraint. We show how the dual algorithm can be made more robust so that it yields good designs consistently in the absence of the perimeter constraint. In particular, we show that the problem of checkerboarding which is frequently observed with the use of lower‐order finite elements is eliminated. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.