Abstract
This article offers detailed rhetorical analyses of the recent National Drug Control Strategy (NDCS) reports, which outline President Clinton's strategies for winning the so-called war on drugs. Unpacking their arguments tells us much about our government's understanding of the relationships among drugs, violence, race, crime, and democracy. To situate this critique of the drug war in a historically based analysis of the relationships among law, power, and force, this article turns to Thucydides' Peloponnesian Wars and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, which emphasize the “nauseous pendulum” that swings between reason and violence. Considering the drug war in relationship to Thucydides and Aristotle bolsters the thesis that our contemporary means of producing power via reasonable political discourse that in practice serves as but the veneer on state-sanctioned violence is not a necessarily abhorrent form of hypocrisy but, rather, one of the fundamental traditions of law itself.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
