Abstract
A new trend in rhetorical analysis is to reconstruct Paul’ s rhetorical strategy from the text itself, rather than applying ancient or modern rhetorical models to his letters. A proposal for such a text-centred approach, in which the focus shifts from the formal to the functional,is briefly summarised in this article, followed by a discussion of the rhetorical situation that Paul wants to address in this letter. Spiritual problems, especially internal unrest and opposition from outside, called forth the letter. In order to address these problems, Paul tries to persuade his audience to persevere in living and proclaiming the gospel. This dominant rhetorical strategy of 1:27 – 2:18 can be divided into four phases: 1:27-30 (exhorting the Philippians to persevere in proclaiming the gospel); 2:1-11 exhorting them to persevere in living the gospel); 2:12-13 (exhorting them to persevere in living the gospel), and 2:14-18 (exhorting them to persevere in proclaiming the gospel). In order to persuade his audience, Paul uses various rhetorical strategies and techniques. In analyzing these, the focus is on exegetical issues with rhetorical impact, on the types of arguments used, on the way Paul argues and on the rhetorical techniques used to enhance the impact of his communication. I hope to prove that Paul’ s persuasive strategy in Philippians could be constructed fairly accurately from the text itself, provided that it is read carefully and systematically.
Highlights
In reaction to the way in which Betz (1979) and his colleagues chose rhetorical models from outside to analyze New Testament texts, scholars started moving towards a reconstruction of Paul’s rhetorical strategy from the text itself
In order to address these problems, Paul tries to persuade his audience to persevere in living and proclaiming the gospel. This dominant rhetorical strategy of 1:27 – 2:18 can be divided into four phases: 1:27-30; 2:1-11; 2:12-13, and 2:14-18
A recent proposal for such a textcentred approach to rhetorical analysis is the publication of Tolmie Persuading the Galatians (2005) in the WUNT series
Summary
In reaction to the way in which Betz (1979) and his colleagues (like Watson 1988 and 1997 in the case of Philippians) chose rhetorical models from outside to analyze New Testament texts, scholars started moving towards a reconstruction of Paul’s rhetorical strategy from the text itself. Examples of this new trend are the works of Kern (1998) on Galatians and Anderson (1999) on Galatians 1-5:12, Romans 1:1-11 and 1 Corinthians. My assumption is that it is not necessary to force rhetorical models from outside on the text in order to understand Paul’s persuasive strategy in Philippians
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
