Abstract

AbstractThis contribution discusses extended physical interface models for fluid–structure interaction problems and investigates their phenomenological effects on the behavior of coupled systems by numerical simulation. Besides the various types of friction at the fluid–structure interface the most interesting phenomena are related to effects due to additional interface stiffness and damping. The paper introduces extended models at the fluid–structure interface on the basis of rheological devices (Hooke, Newton, Kelvin, Maxwell, Zener). The interface is decomposed into a Lagrangian layer for the solid‐like part and an Eulerian layer for the fluid‐like part. The mechanical model for fluid–structure interaction is based on the equations of rigid body dynamics for the structural part and the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations for viscous flow. The resulting weighted residual form uses the interface velocity and interface tractions in both layers in addition to the field variables for fluid and structure. The weak formulation of the whole coupled system is discretized using space–time finite elements with a discontinuous Galerkin method for time‐integration leading to a monolithic algebraic system. The deforming fluid domain is taken into account by deformable space–time finite elements and a pseudo‐structure approach for mesh motion. The sensitivity of coupled systems to modification of the interface model and its parameters is investigated by numerical simulation of flow induced vibrations of a spring supported fluid‐immersed cylinder. It is shown that the presented rheological interface model allows to influence flow‐induced vibrations. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Highlights

  • Real-life situations of fluid–structure interaction may involve complex physical effects at the coupling interface that separates the fluid domain from the structural part

  • The aim of this paper is to provide a numerical strategy for reduced-order interface description in the context of fluid–structure interaction problems

  • The weighted residual method is applied to the set of governing equations, including the two-layer rheological interface model, and the resulting weak form is discretized using a time-discontinuous Galerkin method based on space–time finite elements

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Real-life situations of fluid–structure interaction may involve complex physical effects at the coupling interface that separates the fluid domain from the structural part. The aim of this paper is to provide a numerical strategy for reduced-order interface description in the context of fluid–structure interaction problems. Monolithic approaches do not partition the overall physical domain so that all model equations are considered in a single coupled system of equations This monolithic method together with a consistent time discretization is an ideal basis for conservative coupling formulations and guarantees the transient-precise coupling. The weighted residual method is applied to the set of governing equations, including the two-layer rheological interface model, and the resulting weak form is discretized using a time-discontinuous Galerkin method based on space–time finite elements. The space–time finite element discretization of a velocity-based monolithic model for strongly coupled fluid–structure interaction problems has been shown to be eligible for a number of different applications [26,27,28,29]. The sensitivity of coupled systems to modification of the interface model and its parameters is investigated by numerical simulation of flow induced vibrations of a spring-supported cylinder immersed in laminar incompressible flow

Generalized rheological model
Composition of interface by Lagrange–Euler layers
Strong form governing equation in the Lagrangian layer
Strong form governing equation in Eulerian layer
SPACE–TIME WEAK FORM OF THE RHEOLOGICAL INTERFACE
Weak form of the Lagrangian layer
Weak form of the Eulerian layer
Transformation to the global basis
Discretization of the weak form in space and time
Verification of the rheological interface model
Model of the fluid flow
Model of spring-supported rigid body
APPLICATION TO ONE-DIMENSIONAL TEST PROBLEM
Weak form
Space–time discretization
Verification of the method by Newmark reference solution
APPLICATION TO VORTEX-INDUCED VIBRATIONS
Fixed cylinder without rheological interface
Fixed cylinder with active rheological interface
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.