Abstract

With the development of mature Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) tools for fluids (air and liquid) and Finite Element Methods (FEM) for solids and structures, many approaches have been proposed to tackle the so-called Fluid–Structure Interaction or Fluid–Solid Interaction (FSI) problems. Traditional partitioned iterations are often used to link available FEM codes with CFD codes in the study of FSI systems. Although these procedures are convenient, fluid mesh adjustments according to the motion and finite deformation of immersed solids or structures can be challenging or even prohibitive. Moreover, complex dynamic behaviors of coupled FSI systems are often lost in these iterative processes. In this paper, the author would like to review the so-called monolithic approaches for the solution of coupled FSI systems as a whole in the context of the immersed boundary method. In particular, the focus is on the implicit monolithic algorithm for compressible solids immersed inside a compressible liquid. Notice here the main focus of this paper is on liquid or more precisely liquid phase of water as working fluid. Using the word liquid, the author would like to emphasize the consideration of the compressibility of the fluid and the assumption of constant density and temperature. It is a common practice to assume that the pressure variations are not strong enough to alter the liquid density in any significant fashion for acoustic fluid–solid interactions problems. Although the algorithm presented in this paper is not directly applicable to aerodynamics in which the density change is significant along with its relationship with the pressure and the temperature, the author did revisit his earlier work on merging immersed boundary method concepts with a fully-fledged compressible aerodynamic code based on high-order compact scheme and energy conservative form of governing equations. In the proposed algorithm, on top of a uniform background (ghost) mesh, a fully implicit immersed method is implemented with mixed finite element methods for compressible liquid as well as immersed compressible solids with a matrix-free Newton–Krylov iterative solution scheme. In this monolithic approach, with the simple modulo function, the immersed solid or structure points can be easily located and thus the displacement projections and force distributions stipulated in the immersed boundary method can be effectively and efficiently implemented. This feature coupled with the key concept of the immersed boundary method helps to avoid topologically challenging mesh adjustments and to incorporate parallel processing commands such as Message Passing Interface (MPI) and further vectorization of the numerical operation. Once these high-performance procedures are implemented coupled with the monolithic implicit matrix-free Newton–Krylov iterative scheme with immersed methods, effective and efficient reduced order modeling techniques can then be employed to explore phase and parametric spaces. The in-house developed programs are at the moment two-dimensional. Furthermore, based on the same approach implemented in one-dimensional test example with one continuum immersed in another continuum, such monolithic implicit matrix-free Newton–Krylov iterative approach can be extended for the study of composites with deformable aggregates and matrix.

Highlights

  • Fluid-Structure interactions (FSI) are ubiquitous in many engineering problems

  • The author would like to revisit immersed methods for compressible FSI systems ranging from acoustic fluid-solid interactions to compressible liquid interacting with deformable structures

  • We confirm that immersed boundary methods can be applicable to compressible liquid interacting with immersed compressible solid in acoustic FSI problems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fluid-Structure interactions (FSI) are ubiquitous in many engineering problems. Many research efforts have been invested in the development of modeling methods over the past few decades [1,2,3,4]. The energy and power inputs to the fluid domain introduced by the immersed solids or immersed structures are identical to those from the equivalent body forces To secure this key feature, the same delta function or kernel function must be used in both the distribution of the resultant nodal forces and the interpolation of the solid velocities based on the surrounding or rather background fluid velocities. The simple fact that a fairly coarse mesh as depicted in Figure 3 could capture coupled frequencies and corresponding modes from low to high ranges demonstrates the promise of this monolithic coupled code with mixed finite element formulations for immersed compressible solids and compressible (or rather nearly incompressible) liquid with constant density

Stability Analysis
Kernel Functions
Compressible Fluid Model for General Grids
Matrix-Free Newton–Krylov Iteration
Results and Verifications
Conclusions and Discussion
Methods

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.