Abstract
Exposure assessment is a key component in the risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). While direct and quantitative measurements of ENMs in complex environmental matrices remain challenging, environmental fate models (EFMs) can be used alternatively for estimating ENMs’ distributions in the environment. This review describes and assesses the development and capability of EFMs, focusing on surface waters. Our review finds that current engineered nanomaterial (ENM) exposure models can be largely classified into three types: material flow analysis models (MFAMs), multimedia compartmental models (MCMs), and spatial river/watershed models (SRWMs). MFAMs, which is already used to derive predicted environmental concentrations (PECs), can be used to estimate the releases of ENMs as inputs to EFMs. Both MCMs and SRWMs belong to EFMs. MCMs are spatially and/or temporally averaged models, which describe ENM fate processes as intermedia transfer of well-mixed environmental compartments. SRWMs are spatiotemporally resolved models, which consider the variability in watershed and/or stream hydrology, morphology, and sediment transport of river networks. As the foundation of EFMs, we also review the existing and emerging ENM fate processes and their inclusion in recent EFMs. We find that while ENM fate processes, such as heteroaggregation and dissolution, are commonly included in current EFMs, few models consider photoreaction and sulfidation, evaluation of the relative importance of fate processes, and the fate of weathered/transformed ENMs. We conclude the review by identifying the opportunities and challenges in using EFMs for ENMs.
Highlights
Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) are intentionally produced or manufactured materials with at least one dimension in the size range of 1–100 nm [1–3]
This review indicates that studies on the emerging ENM fate processes, such as photoreaction and sulfidation, that are relevant for ENMs, such as AgNPs, carbon-based ENMs, and ZnO [72,73,91–94,96, 97,100,102–105], have grown significantly in the past 5–10 years, but these processes are not commonly included in recent environmental fate models (EFMs) [42,59,65]
Further research could continue to model these existing transformed ENMs and consider other less common ones, such as ENMs released from industrial or consumer products that are embedded in product matrices
Summary
Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) are intentionally produced or manufactured materials with at least one dimension in the size range of 1–100 nm [1–3]. William et al [34] reviewed the nano-specific processes as well as the releases, forms, and particle sizes of ENMs considered in recent aquatic fate models. Significant progresses in ENM fate modeling in the aquatic environment have been made, especially in surface waters, that provide good spatial and temporal resolution with the consideration of new nano-specific processes, such as sunlight-driven photoreactions; these recent advances have not generally been included in existing reviews [41,42]. MFAMs quantify the release of ENMs in life-cycle stages from production to waste disposal/recycling into the environment [47–51], while EFMs consider the mechanistic fate and transport processes (i.e., nano-specific fate processes) in the prediction of ENMs’ concentrations in or across environmental compartments (e.g., water, sediment, soil, or air) [52,53]. A detailed surface water quality model with ENM fate and transport processes Suitable for urban stormwater and sewage systems; coupling both surface hydrology and hydrodynamic models
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
