Abstract
AbstractTechnologies for upgrading fast pyrolysis bio‐oil to drop‐in fuels and coproducts are under development and show promise for decarbonizing energy supply for transportation and chemicals markets. The successful commercialization of these fuels and the technologies deployed to produce them depend on production costs, scalability, and yield. To meet environmental regulations, pyrolysis‐based biofuels need to adhere to life cycle greenhouse gas intensity standards relative to their petroleum‐based counterparts. We review literature on fast pyrolysis bio‐oil upgrading and explore key metrics that influence their commercial viability through life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno‐economic analysis (TEA) methods together with technology readiness level (TRL) evaluation. We investigate the trade‐offs among economic, environmental, and technological metrics derived from these methods for individual technologies as a means of understanding their nearness to commercialization. Although the technologies reviewed have not attained commercial investment, some have been pilot tested. Predicting the projected performance at scale‐up through models can, with industrial experience, guide decision‐making to competitively meet energy policy goals. LCA and TEA methods that ensure consistent and reproducible models at a given TRL are needed to compare alternative technologies. This study highlights the importance of integrated analysis of multiple economic, environmental, and technological metrics for understanding performance prospects and barriers among early stage technologies.
Highlights
Over the last decade, global transportation-related CO2 emissions rose by 97 million metric tons, an increase of 5.4%, with motor gasoline accounting for 58% of emissions (U.S Energy Information Administration, 2015)
Biomass can be converted to an energy dense fuel that can fit into existing infrastructure and meet energy policies on renewable and low carbon fuels (Liu et al, 2014; Richard, 2010)
Beginning with studies listed under technology readiness level (TRL) 5 and 6, this review shows that only the tail gas reactive pyrolysis (TGRP) with extraction study by Sorunmu et al (2017) estimates all three metrics
Summary
Global transportation-related CO2 emissions rose by 97 million metric tons, an increase of 5.4%, with motor gasoline accounting for 58% of emissions (U.S Energy Information Administration, 2015). Biomass, bio-oil upgrading, fast pyrolysis, prospective life cycle assessment, techno-economic analysis, technology readiness
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
