Abstract

Biomass is relatively cleaner than coal and is the only renewable carbon resource that can be directly converted into fuel. Biomass can significantly contribute to the world’s energy needs if harnessed sustainably. However, there are also problems associated with the thermal conversion of biomass. This paper investigates and discusses issues associated with the thermal conversion of coal and biomass as a blend. Most notable topics reviewed are slagging and fouling caused by the relatively reactive alkali and alkaline earth compounds (K2O, Na2O and CaO) found in biomass ash. The alkali and alkaline earth metals (AAEM) present and dispersed in biomass fuels induce catalytic activity during co-conversion with coal. The catalytic activity is most noticeable when blended with high rank coals. The synergy during co-conversion is still controversial although it has been theorized that biomass acts like a hydrogen donor in liquefaction. Published literature also shows that coal and biomass exhibit different mechanisms, depending on the operating conditions, for the formation of nitrogen (N) and sulfur species. Utilization aspects of fly ash from blending coal and biomass are discussed. Recommendations are made on pretreatment options to increase the energy density of biomass fuels through pelletization, torrefaction and flash pyrolysis to reduce transportation costs.

Highlights

  • Energy is the cornerstone to economic stability and development

  • This paper investigates and discusses issues associated with the thermal conversion of coal and biomass as a blend

  • Considering biomass as a carbon-neutral resource, CO2 emission should decline proportionally to the amount of coal offset by biomass [14]; thermal conversion of biomass prevents some biomass waste from occupying landfills and reduces the landfill methane emission

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Energy is the cornerstone to economic stability and development. Since the industrial revolution, fossil fuels have stimulated economic growth especially in the developed world. Giving a high hydrogen yield, has the disadvantage of low energy density because of its high oxygen and moisture content This shortcoming is compensated for when blended with a higher energy content coal. Biomass, compared to coal, has lower sulfur, N and heavy metals It is carbon-neutral if produced sustainably, co-conversion of biomass and coal can make significant contributions in mitigating GHG emission and other emissions. Co-conversion of coal and biomass offers a better prospect for cleaner coal utilization and a way to dispose wastes/biomass in an economical, safe, and environmentally-acceptable manner Some research on these systems has been performed, the wide variability of parameters (type of feedstock, type of gasifier, gasification conditions) in these systems requires additional research to identify the most important parameters and clarify how they affect the co-conversion efficiency and product yield. Given the complexity of gasification compared to other processes, it will be the focal process during this analysis

Feedstock Preprocessing and Feeding
Feedstock
Synergy through Catalytic Effect
Synergy through Other Mechanisms
Direct Liquefaction
Pyrolysis
Gasification and Combustion
General Assessment
Hydrogen and Free Radicals Interaction
Enhanced Conversion of Solvent Swollen Coal
Pressure
Effect of Pressure on Char Characteristics
Co-Conversion and Emissions
Fuel Nitrogen Behavior during Biomass Conversion
Fuel Nitrogen Behavior during Coal Conversion
Ash Characteristics in Co-Fired Systems
Forms of Mineral Matter in Solid Fuels and Influence on Ash Behavior
Prediction of Coal-Biomass Ash Behavior
Utilization of Ash from Coal-Biomass Co-Fired Systems
Fertilizer and Fertilization
Cement Manufacture and Civil Engineering Application
Findings
Summary and Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call