Abstract

The well-known subprime mortgage crisis, which began to manifest in early 2007, since when the effects of the speculative bubble begin to become evident from the increase in default rates in residential mortgages, has triggered a global crisis that has pushed various legislations over time to implement a series of financial reforms with the specific objective of avoiding that similar phenomena could be repeated over time. The ability to repay a loan is strongly influenced by the amortization algorithm that the bank has decided to adopt. This appears even more evident in variable interest rate loans since, as the economic conditions of the indexation parameter change, the definition of the loan balance and the related portion of interest will be decisive in relation to the borrower’s ability to repay the loaned capital. A study of the main amortization algorithms and the related descriptions in the bank contracts will allow us to show which are the main issues due to an information asymmetry that, unfortunately, characterizes this type of contract and would seem to be one of the main reasons that lie at the root of the aforementioned crisis of subprime mortgages in the USA. Moreover, the authors will provide a clear analysis of the financial indicators usually reported in loan contracts and how often these indications are insufficient to characterize the actual cost of the loan. Furthermore, by highlighting the discretionary choice that banks often obtain following the contractual loan schemes commonly offered to retail and corporate clients, we will show how this often translates into greater cost to the borrower. Finally, we will propose two possible solutions to the problems highlighted, thus allowing us to reduce this information gap, which unfortunately translates into greater costs for customers with the associated increase in default rates, or the so-called nonperforming loan (NPLs) contracts. Therefore, the objective of this contribution is to show which are the most critical aspects of the bank contracts related to contractual transparency and to the presence or otherwise of hidden costs, i.e., not expressly shown in the contract. Specifically, we refer to the loan contracts issued in Italy both with reference to the local banking legislation and to the European one to which Italy must often refer.

Highlights

  • The financial crisis has shown that irresponsible behavior by market operators can put the basics of the financial system at risk by creating a lack of trust between all the parties involved, in consumers in particular, and potentially serious socio-economic consequences

  • For illustrative purposes of the aforementioned description, the effective annual percentage interest rate (EAPR) indicator variation curve is reported below when the “m’” parameter of Equation (48) changes in order to calculate the temporal dynamics of variation of the updated EAPR rate, actualized at the time of contractual stipulation t0 : In Figure 1 we report an instance of EAPR dynamic curve for a loan structured as follows (Table 5): Economies2019, 2019,7,7,x91

  • The mathematical analysis of the main loan repayment algorithms in relation to the main contractual clauses in theanalysis loan contracts offered to retail algorithms and corporate

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The financial crisis has shown that irresponsible behavior by market operators can put the basics of the financial system at risk by creating a lack of trust between all the parties involved, in consumers in particular, and potentially serious socio-economic consequences. The problems identified may have significant cascading effects on the macroeconomic plan, causing harm consumers, acting as an economic or legal barrier to cross-border activities, and creating unequal conditions for market operators (Peng 2009) To this is added the presence of policies of poor transparency in the drafting of banking contracts with specific reference to the agreed amortization algorithm. 2014/17/EU 2014 MCD (Mortgage Credit Directive), which arises the objective of giving greater protection to the borrower, as the aim is to guarantee a high level of protection for those who sign credit agreements relating to real estate (Directive 2014/17/EU 2014) In this contribution we will refer to the banking contracts of Italian law regulated at present by the so-called Banking. The article will conclude by suggesting possible solutions to the problematic issues

The Main Loan Amortization Schedules
Straight-Line
Annuity
Bullet
Balloon
Amortization Schedule Number 2
Amortization Schedule Number 3
The EAPR
3: Onerousness of loan—example
Benchmark in terms paid interests for the loan reported in Table
Conclusions
The proposed
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call