Abstract

It is estimated that 6.3 million children who die annually need pediatric palliative care (PPC) and that only about 10% of them receive the attention they need because about 98% of them live in under-resourced settings where PPC is not accessible. The consultative model and the integrated model of care (IMOC) are the most common strategies used to make PPC available to critically ill children. In the consultative model, the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) team, the patient, or their family must request a palliative care (PC) consultation with the external PC team for a PICU patient to be evaluated for special care needs. While the consultation model has historically been more popular, issues related to specialist availability, referral timing, staff’s personal biases, misconceptions about PC, and other factors may impede excellent candidates from receiving the attention they need in a timely manner. Contrastingly, in the IMOC, family-centered care, PC tasks, and/or PC are a standard part of the treatment automatically available to all patients. In the IMOC, the PICU team is trained to complete critical and PC tasks as a part of normal daily operations. This review investigates the claim that the IMOC is the best model to meet extensive PPC needs in PICUs, especially in low-resource settings; based on an extensive review of the literature, we have identified five reasons why this model may be superior. The IMOC appears to: (1) improve the delivery of PPC and pediatric critical care, (2) allow clinicians to better respond to the care needs of patients and the epidemiological realities of their settings in ways that are consistent with evidence-based recommendations, (3) facilitate the universal delivery of care to all patients with special care needs, (4) maximize available resources, and (5) build local capacity; each of these areas should be further researched to develop a model of care that enables clinicians to provide pediatric patients with the highest attainable standard of health care. The IMOC lays out a pathway to provide the world’s sickest, most vulnerable children with access to PPC, a human right to which they are entitled by international legal conventions.

Highlights

  • Razban et al found that nurses’ beliefs were significantly correlated with their own “...personal study about palliative care, level of education, and experience of caring for a dying family member” [7]. These findings suggest that education is key to creating an environment receptive to PC

  • The direct integration of PC into the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is met with resistance because of prevalent myths and misconceptions about PC, discipline-related bias, and ignorance of evidence-based recommendations related to the application of PC

  • Evidence [4, 5, 31] indicates that virtually all patients admitted to the PICU have some level of PC need; PICU models must make PC highly accessible to all patients who may develop special care needs throughout their stay in the unit

Read more

Summary

A Review of the integrated Model of Care

Reviewed by: Vijay Srinivasan, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, United States Kavita Morparia, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center,. The consultative model is overall more common [5], the IMOC appears to offer distinct benefits to patients with pediatric palliative care (PPC) needs and, in pediatric ICUs, “is rapidly becoming the standard for high quality care of critically ill children” [4]. While both models can make PC available in ICUs and pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), the IMOC may be more beneficial to patients/their families and may be better suited to under-resourced settings where hiring outside specialists may be impossible. Cook and Rocker explain, “The coexistence of palliative care and critical care may seem paradoxical in the

Summary
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call