Abstract

China’s South–North Water Transfer Project (SNWTP) has the potential to transfer as much as 44.8 km3 year−1 of water from the Yangtze River basin to the Yellow River basin. However, the SNWTP has not been assessed from a sustainability perspective. Thus, in this study we evaluated the SNWTP’s economic, social, and environmental impacts by reviewing the English literature published in journals that are part of the Web of Science database. We then synthesized this literature using a Triple Bottom Line framework of sustainability assessment. Our study has led to three main findings: (1) whether the SNWTP is economically beneficial depends largely on model assumptions, meaning that economic gains at the regional and national level are uncertain; (2) the SNWTP requires the resettlement of hundreds of thousands of people and challenges existing water management institutions, suggesting possible social concerns beyond the short term; and (3) evidently large environmental costs in water-providing areas and uncertain environmental benefits in water-receiving areas together point to an uncertain environmental future for the geographic regions involved. Thus, the overall sustainability of SNWTP is seriously questionable. Although much work has been done studying individual aspects of SNWTP’s sustainability, few studies have utilized the multi-scale, transdisciplinary approaches that such a project demands. To minimize environmental risks, ensure social equity, and sustain economic benefits, we suggest that the project be continuously monitored in all three dimensions, and that integrated sustainability assessments and policy improvements be carried out periodically.

Highlights

  • Access to clean water is fundamental to sustainable development

  • Even without the WR-South–North Water Transfer Project (SNWTP) this figure is expected to rise to 27.8 km3/year in the near future [7,11], making the SNWTP one of the grandest attempts by humans to alter their environment at regional and super-regional scales

  • Some general conclusions emerge from our literature review and synthesis: projected economic gains vary widely, with no guaranteed economic success at the national level; socially, the project will create challenges at local and regional scales, depending on the central government’s policies; and environmental costs in the water-providing area will be large, while benefits in the water-receiving areas will be path-dependent

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite the central role of water, as much as 80% of the human population lives in a state of water insecurity [1]. On a global scale water is abundant, suggesting that the problems of water scarcity are partly attributable to spatial and temporal mismatches in water availability and water demand [2]. One solution to these spatial mismatches is to move water from water-rich areas to water-poor areas using inter-basin water transfers. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1489 Sustainability 2017, 9, 1489 2 of 11 2 of 11. R transfer in human history [10] EoxrasceenribnagtewdabteyrthsceaNrcCitPy’.sEcxraitcicearbl aptleadcebiyn tChheinNaC’sPf’osocdristuicpapl lpylacnediencoCnhoinmay’,s thfoios dscsaurcpiptylyhaansdloencgonleoamdyt,htehCishsicnaersceitgyohvaesrnlomnegnltetaodsteheek Calhteinrnesaetivgeovmerenamsuernets ttoo saelleekviaalterwnaattievre smtresassuinretshtiso raelgleiovniat[e7,w8]a. tBerosatdrelysscionntcheiisvreedgbioynC[h7,a8i]r.mBaronaMdlayocZonedceoinvged[9b]y, tChehaSiorumtahn–NMoarothZWedaotenrg T[r9a]n, stfheer SPoroujtehc–tN(SoNrtWh TWPa) treerpTrersaennstfseCr hPirnoaje’sctg(rSaNndWesTtPa)ttreemppretsteonstoslCvehitnhae’sNgCrPa’nsdwesattearttwemoepstthtorosuoglvhe ththeelaNrgCePs’tsiwntaetre-br awsioneswtahtreorutgrahntshferlainrgheustminantehr-ibstaosriny w[1a0]te. r transfer in human history [10]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call