Abstract
The Child Development Associate Project is of sufficient magnitude and importance to warrant and benefit from a fair and open public examination. However, Berk and Berson's analysis is in need of factual correction and represents a biased view of the program. This paper seeks to set straight the facts while indicating the areas where additional research and discussion are warranted.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
