Abstract

Porphyry copper deposits (PCDs) are some of the most important sources of copper (Cu) and molybdenum (Mo). Typically, the separation and recovery of chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) and molybdenite (MoS2), the major Cu and Mo minerals, respectively, in PCDs are achieved by two-step flotation involving (1) bulk flotation to separate Cu–Mo concentrates and tailings (e.g., pyrite, silicate, and aluminosilicate minerals) and (2) Cu–Mo flotation to separate chalcopyrite and molybdenite. In Cu–Mo flotation, chalcopyrite is depressed using Cu depressants, such as NaHS, Na2S, Nokes reagent (P2S5 + NaOH), and NaCN, meaning that it is recovered as tailings, while molybdenite is floated and recovered as froth product. Although conventionally used depressants are effective in the separation of Cu and Mo, they have the potential to emit toxic and deadly gases such as H2S and HCN when operating conditions are not properly controlled. To address these problems caused by the use of conventional depressants, many studies aimed to develop alternative methods of depressing either chalcopyrite or molybdenite. In this review, recent advances in chalcopyrite and molybdenite depressions for Cu–Mo flotation separation are reviewed, including alternative organic and inorganic depressants for Cu or Mo, as well as oxidation-treatment technologies, such as ozone (O3), plasma, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and electrolysis, which create hydrophilic coatings on the mineral surface.

Highlights

  • Porphyry copper deposits (PCDs) are the world’s most important sources of copper (Cu) because they account for more than 60% of global annual copper production [1,2]

  • The floatability of molybdenite was strongly depressed by lignosulfonate in a wide pH range of 5–11, regardless of used pH adjusters (e.g., CaO, Na2 CO3, and KOH). These results suggest that chalcopyrite/molybdenite separation could be achieved by using sodium sulfonates in the absence of Ca2+

  • Kor et al [35] investigated the effects of electrolyte concentration and composition on the adsorption of two carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) polymers (high substitution, high blockiness (HSHB); low substitution, low blockiness (LSLB)) onto the molybdenite surface, and confirmed that higher ionic strength (2.76 × 10−2 M KCl) contributes to thicker layers with higher of CMCs is not limited to molybdenite, that is, CMCs can play roles in depressing chalcopyrite and/or molybdenite, which is strongly dependent on operating conditions and ore compositions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Porphyry copper deposits (PCDs) are the world’s most important sources of copper (Cu) because they account for more than 60% of global annual copper production [1,2]. 2008); they have significant economic value due to their large size (typically greater than 100 million tons), long mine lives (spanning several decades), and high production rates (i.e., millions of tons of copper per year) [1]. These deposits are important sources of molybdenum (Mo), gold (Au), and silver (Ag) [1,5].

Occurrence
Typical Process of Cu–Mo Sulfide Ores
Molybdenite Depression
Results
Dextrin
Lignosulfonates
Carboxymethyl-Based Organic Compounds and Humic Acid
Effect
Depression of Cu Minerals
Inorganic Depressants
Recovery
SO3 as a XPS spectra of chalcopyrite treated with
SO3 as
Organic Depressants
Ozone Oxidation
Plasma Oxidation
13. Flotation
Electrolysis Oxidation
Microencapsulation Techniques for Depressing Cu Minerals
Findings
Summary
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.