Abstract

We retrospectively explore the effectiveness of various probabilistic opinion pools against a set of insider threat detection modeling data from a recently completed, multiyear, sponsored research effort. We explored four opinion pools: the linear opinion pool (likely the most popular), the beta-transformed linear opinion pool, the geometric opinion pool, and a multiplicative method based on odds called Bordley’s formula. The data for our study came from our recent work in the inference of insider threats for our research sponsor. In this work, we created a multimodeling inference enterprise modeling (MIEM) process to either predict threats within a population or, given the threats, predict how well the enterprise system can detect those threats. As part of larger research challenges designed by the research sponsor, we applied the MIEM process quarterly to respond to a sequence of varying challenge problems (CPs). Via MIEM, we developed multiple, independent computation forecast models. These models generated certainty intervals to answer CP questions. These intervals were fused into a single interval for each question via an expert panel prior to submission. The sponsors scored the responses against ground truth. In this paper, we (a) ask which pooling functions work best on these data and consider why, and (b) compare this performance to the actual submissions to determine if one of the pooling functions performed better than our judgment-based fusion.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.