Abstract

Cutting-edge lipidomic profiling measures hundreds or even thousands of lipids in plasma and is increasingly used to investigate mechanisms of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In this review, we introduce lipidomic techniques, describe distributions of lipids across lipoproteins, and summarize findings on the association of lipids with CVD based on lipidomics. The main findings of 16 cohort studies were that, independent of total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), ceramides (d18:1/16:0, d18:1/18:0, and d18:1/24:1) and phosphatidylcholines (PCs) containing saturated and monounsaturated fatty acyl chains are positively associated with risks of CVD outcomes, while PCs containing polyunsaturated fatty acyl chains (PUFA) are inversely associated with risks of CVD outcomes. Lysophosphatidylcholines (LPCs) may be positively associated with risks of CVD outcomes. Interestingly, the distributions of the identified lipids vary across lipoproteins: LPCs are primarily contained in HDLs, ceramides are mainly contained in low-density lipoproteins (LDLs), and PCs are distributed in both HDLs and LDLs. Thus, the potential mechanism behind previous findings may be related to the effect of the identified lipids on the biological functions of HDLs and LDLs. Only eight studies on the lipidomics of HDL and non-HDL particles and CVD outcomes have been conducted, which showed that higher triglycerides (TAGs), lower PUFA, lower phospholipids, and lower sphingomyelin content in HDLs might be associated with a higher risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). However, the generalizability of these studies is a major concern, given that they used case–control or cross-sectional designs in hospital settings, included a very small number of participants, and did not correct for multiple testing or adjust for blood lipids such as HDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), or TAGs. Overall, findings from the literature highlight the importance of research on lipidomics of lipoproteins to enhance our understanding of the mechanism of the association between the identified lipids and the risk of CVD and allow the identification of novel lipid biomarkers in HDLs and LDLs, independent of HDL-c and LDL-c. Lipidomic techniques show the feasibility of this exciting research direction, and the lack of high-quality epidemiological studies warrants well-designed prospective cohort studies.

Highlights

  • Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death globally, accounting for 17.8 million deaths per year [1]

  • The lipidomic-wide association LURIC study first showed that the three ceramides were positively associated with the risks of recurrent coronary heart disease (CHD) and mortality and that Cer (d18:1/24:0) was inversely associated [23]; these associations were eliminated after adjusting for multiple testing

  • The findings were observed in the LURIC study, WHI, PREDIMED trial, ADVANCE trial, and LIPID study [23,24,26,32,33,34], and the associations persisted after adjusting for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) and low-density lipoproteins (LDLs)-c

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death globally, accounting for 17.8 million deaths per year [1]. Plasma lipid biomarkers including high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), and triglycerides (TAG) have been used to assess the risk of CVD for decades [2,3,4]. Metabolites 2020, 10, 163 predicted approximately 75% of CVD risk [5]. These lipid biomarkers are clinically used for the evaluation of CVD risk and decision on CVD treatment [6]. Lipidomics can be incorporated into CVD epidemiology to enhance our understanding of how lipids (i.e., individual lipids and fatty acyl chains esterified with the glycerol backbone) affect the risk of CVD and potentially improve CVD prediction in addition to HDL-c and LDL-c. We introduce lipidomic techniques, summarize recent advances in lipidomics of CVD, compare lipid composition across lipoproteins, and highlight areas of future research based on the existing literature

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call